Bug#432658: plan

2007-07-23 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Zack Weinberg writes: > 0.36 should be ready in a few days; upstream proceeds with boost > removal, but it won't happen for that release. More likely 0.37. My > inclination is to leave Architecture: alone for the 0.36 release -- > perhaps it will miraculously start working on arm, after all. Agr

Bug#432658: plan

2007-07-22 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 7/22/07, Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not so imminent. [...] Imminent was perhaps the wrong word, but nonetheless, I don't see much value in trying to isolate a bug in g++-4.1 when 4.2 should be live in the near future, especially when, as you say Monotone 0.35-2 is now 8 day

Bug#432658: plan

2007-07-22 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Not so imminent. There is some pushback from the linux and Mozilla maintainers because gcc-4.2 introduces build failures in those packages (see the archives of debian-release for the past couple of days). Also, the glibc maintainers would like to stage a transition to a new version of glibc befor

Bug#432658: plan

2007-07-21 Thread Zack Weinberg
For the record - since I'm pretty sure this is a compiler bug and the g++ 4.2 transition is imminent, I'm going to wait and see if the package builds with 4.2, and if it does, I'll downgrade this to normal and reassign it to g++-4.1. zw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje