notfound 431327 0.8.1a-4+b1
found 431327 0.8.1a-4
retitle 431161 [Versioning] Some binNMUs have the wrong source version reported
thanks
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007, Touko Korpela wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 06:58:59AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > The BTS understands binary NMUs correctly, but the
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 06:58:59AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> The BTS understands binary NMUs correctly, but the problem here is
> that the found version of this bug has not been mapped to the source
> that created it correctly.
>
> It should be marked as found in cyptcat/20031202-2, not +b1.
>
severity 431161 minor
found 431010 cryptcat/20031202-2
notfound 431010 cryptcat/20031202-2+b1
found 366383 cryptcat/20031202-2
notfound 366383 cryptcat/20031202-2+b1
found 390033 cryptcat/20031202-2
notfound 390033 cryptcat/20031202-2+b1
thanks
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Touko Korpela wrote:
> Package:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:03:14PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:56:40PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > For example bug #431010 is reported binNMU as version information.
> > Version graph shows that BTS doesn't understand it.
>
> The BTS tracks source versions
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:56:40PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> For example bug #431010 is reported binNMU as version information.
> Version graph shows that BTS doesn't understand it.
The BTS tracks source versions only. If something was fixable in a binNMU, it
was by definition not a problem i
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: normal
For example bug #431010 is reported binNMU as version information.
Version graph shows that BTS doesn't understand it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo
