On Sun, 2009-05-03 at 13:24 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> retitle 430818 X reports 0x0 physical screen size
> tag 430818 moreinfo
> kthxbye
> >
> (X isn't technically reporting any dpi value; it's reporting dimensions
> in pixels and in millimeters)
>
> Didrik, to investigate this, we'll need th
retitle 430818 X reports 0x0 physical screen size
tag 430818 moreinfo
kthxbye
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 18:50:24 +1300, Hamish wrote:
> > Everything is linked to the fact I was using a dual-head configuration.
> ...
> > d...@ddp:~$ xdpyinfo | grep -A1 dimen
> > dimensions:1280x1024 pixels (0
> Everything is linked to the fact I was using a dual-head configuration.
...
> d...@ddp:~$ xdpyinfo | grep -A1 dimen
> dimensions:1280x1024 pixels (0x0 millimeters)
> resolution:-2147483648x-2147483648 dots per inch
>
> --> this dirty value is the culprit ;-)
>
> The workaround is to
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Didrik Pinte wrote:
> The change causes the resolution not being read correctly :
>
> Before the change :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ xdpyinfo | grep -A1 dimen
> dimensions:1400x1050 pixels (370x278 millimeters)
> resolution:96x96 dots per inch
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 09:48 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> 6.2.2 is almost out with quite a few fixes to the gis.m interfaces, I
> would check with that. BTW, out svn repo contains 6.2.2 in trunk currently.
Hi,
I've found a workaround for the problem.
Everything is linked to the fact
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 09:48 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> >
>
> 6.2.2 is almost out with quite a few fixes to the gis.m interfaces, I
> would check with that. BTW, out svn repo contains 6.2.2 in trunk currently.
Just to add some information, i've tested grass 6.2.1-3 under testing
and i
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:22:16AM +0200, Didrik Pinte wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 10:03 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 03:11:34PM +0200, Didrik Pinte wrote:
> > > Package: grass
> > > Version: 6.2.1-3
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 10:03 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 03:11:34PM +0200, Didrik Pinte wrote:
> > Package: grass
> > Version: 6.2.1-3
> > Severity: normal
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The user interface of the grass version of sid seems a bit broken. When
> > askin
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 03:11:34PM +0200, Didrik Pinte wrote:
> Package: grass
> Version: 6.2.1-3
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The user interface of the grass version of sid seems a bit broken. When asking
> for the vector import dialog, something screwed up appear and the following
> error
Package: grass
Version: 6.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
The user interface of the grass version of sid seems a bit broken. When asking
for the vector import dialog, something screwed up appear and the following
error message appears on the command line :
GRASS 6.2.1 (ALMERIA):~ > bgerror failed to
10 matches
Mail list logo
