On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 02:57:34PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Having thought about this again for a while, I'm no longer convinced we
> should change the source package name. Indeed, the API was changed, but
> we are not going to support both omniorb4.0 and omniorb4.1.
>
> omnievents, which bui
Hi all,
> is the question if it's (intended to be) fully API compatible, then the
> source package could just me updated.
>
> > The library packages do change name (from foo4 to foo4-1) due to the
> > soname change, so anyone depending on it (i.e. omnievents) will be
> > broken until they are reb
Hi Floris,
on Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 03:06:18PM +0100 you wrote:
> I must admit I only use omniORB through omniORBpy, so don't really
> know the anser. I had a look in the release notes and documentation
> but didn't find anything explicitly, so I've asked this on the
> omniorb-users lists.
is the
On 04/10/2007, Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:19:30PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> > But you're right, we'll need to check if it's possible to upgrade
> > without breaking existing applications. If it's not we'll probably have
> > to package this in a separate
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:19:30PM +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Floris is currently working on packaging omniorb 4.1 (see [1]).
> If I recall correctly, omniorb 4.0 is *not* compatible with Python 2.5,
> so in order to be able to provide python 2.5 modules for omniorb we need
> to move forward to
notfound 430422 4.1.0-1~flub1
found 430422 4.0.6-2.3
thanks
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:55:28AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi Floris,
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 01:19:10PM +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> > Attached is the .diff.gz against the upstream omniORB-4.1 tarball that
> > does the req
Hi Floris,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 01:19:10PM +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> Attached is the .diff.gz against the upstream omniORB-4.1 tarball that
> does the required work. It fixes almost all of omniorb4's outstanding
> bugs too as added bonus and should only need minor changes for adoption
Package: omniorb4
Version: 4.1.0-1~flub1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi
As per http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2007/06/msg9.html we
should be preparing for the python2.5 transition. As it happens
python-omniorb2 needs to be upgraded to omniORBpy-3.0 to work with
python2.5 due to the f
8 matches
Mail list logo