fixed 428582 2.18.1~cvs20071027-1
thanks
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:54:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > > reassign 428582 binutils
> > Bug#428582: xulrunner_1.8.1.4-2 (mips/unstable): FTBFS: relocation overfl
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:54:07PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 428582 binutils
> Bug#428582: xulrunner_1.8.1.4-2 (mips/unstable): FTBFS: relocation overflow
> Bug reassigned from package `binutils' to `binutils'.
>
> > notfo
reassign 428582 binutils
notfound 428582 2.18.1~cvs20071027-1
thanks
Mike Hommey wrote:
[snip]
> > > It seems iceape and iceweasel finally built on mips. I'll give a shot
> > > with xulrunner.
> >
> > A testbuild succeeded for me, I missed to update the bug with that
> > information.
>
> So, cou
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:13:46AM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > [CC'd to debian-mips.]
> > > >
> > > > On
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [CC'd to debian-mips.]
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > Steve Lan
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [CC'd to debian-mips.]
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [CC'd to debian-mips.]
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 20
[CC'd to debian-mips.]
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Please recheck wit
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > > miss another backport from the trunk.
>
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > miss another backport from the trunk.
> Did someone check already ?
Pro
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> miss another backport from the trunk.
Did someone check already ?
> Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too
> stric
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:56:26PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Anyways, changing this won't solve the problem with new xulrunner
> > upstream releases... and the real problem is still on the ftp archive
> > anyways...
>
> I very much doubt that for subsubminor version cha
Mike Hommey writes:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:21:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Mike Hommey writes:
> > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Mike Hommey writes:
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:4
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 01:34:24PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-13 20:46]:
> > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > miss another backport from the trunk.
> FWIW, xulrunner currently doesn't build with gcc-snapshot
* Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-13 20:46]:
> Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> miss another backport from the trunk.
FWIW, xulrunner currently doesn't build with gcc-snapshot. I have not
investigated whether this is a bug in the compiler or xulrun
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:21:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mike Hommey writes:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
Mike Hommey writes:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Mike Hommey writes:
> > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mike Hommey writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > > miss another backpo
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> miss another backport from the trunk.
>
> Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too
> strict dependencies on the binar
Mike Hommey writes:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
> > miss another backport from the trunk.
> >
> > Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too
>
Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We may
miss another backport from the trunk.
Side note: gcc-snapshot currently cannot be built due to the too
strict dependencies on the binary-indep packages; reported as #385793,
"solved" by the xulrunner maintainers. Please build the
21 matches
Mail list logo
