On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 06:59:43PM +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> >FWIW, it seems to be the FSF's position that the rewritten "system
> >libraries" exception in GPLv3 does *not* apply to libraries such as
> >OpenSSL,
> >only to libraries that constitute "language runtimes". I don't think this
Hi James
James Andrewartha wrote:
> Shane, Anthony - Did you get a response from Brett Smith regarding
> Anthony's most recent post to debian-legal? I can't see anything since
> then on debian-legal.
I didn't get anything related to that outside of debian-legal. Perhaps
Brett emailed Anthony dir
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
FWIW, it seems to be the FSF's position that the rewritten "system
libraries" exception in GPLv3 does *not* apply to libraries such as OpenSSL,
only to libraries that constitute "language runtimes". I don't think this
follows directly from the license
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 12:55:41AM +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> Now that GPLv3 is out, everything that's GPLv2 or later (which is most
> packages, except nuauth, zabbix-agent and maybe others) can be distributed
> as GPLv3 and linked against OpenSSL, due to the following text of GPLv3:
> Th
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> James Andrewartha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Now that GPLv3 is out, everything that's GPLv2 or later (which is most
>> packages, except nuauth, zabbix-agent and maybe others) can be
>> distributed as GPLv3 and linked against OpenSSL, due to the foll
James Andrewartha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that GPLv3 is out, everything that's GPLv2 or later (which is most
> packages, except nuauth, zabbix-agent and maybe others) can be
> distributed as GPLv3 and linked against OpenSSL, due to the following
> text of GPLv3:
I think there are packag
6 matches
Mail list logo
