> > That's possible, yes.
>
> > It's quite some time now since I don't read the upstream lists
> > anymore, which I'm reconsidering to do. Do you think that such
> > question pertains to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or samba-technical?
>
> I guess this is still an open question, since I haven't seen any dis
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:35:22AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > What does this do to long-lived client connections that may be idle for
> > minutes (or hours while the user is away from his desk) at a time?
> Theyr're just reconnected. Most, if not all clients, now silently
> reopen connect
> What does this do to long-lived client connections that may be idle for
> minutes (or hours while the user is away from his desk) at a time?
Theyr're just reconnected. Most, if not all clients, now silently
reopen connections when they're closed.
>
> I would prefer to have a discussion with u
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 07:49:24AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Daniel F. Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Package: samba
> > Version: 3.0.24-6
> > Severity: minor
> > Running "netstat -tap" in my environment showed many connections being
> > fielded by smbd, some probably many weeks ol
Quoting Daniel F. Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.24-6
> Severity: minor
>
> Running "netstat -tap" in my environment showed many connections being
> fielded by smbd, some probably many weeks old.
>
> The default configuration revealed that Samba was sending keepalive m
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.24-6
Severity: minor
Running "netstat -tap" in my environment showed many connections being
fielded by smbd, some probably many weeks old.
The default configuration revealed that Samba was sending keepalive messages
even though the connections didn't ask for anything t
6 matches
Mail list logo
