On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 23:42 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
>
>
> Any news on this?
Ugh, I'd forgotten all about it - sorry. Thanks for the reminder, I'll
try find the time to get this resolved soon.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:39:12PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 19:32 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > Arm eabi[1] has different syscall base than oldabi arm. Please
> > include attached patch.
> I had this atch merged upstream a little while back, but haven't had
> a chance to
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 19:32 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Package: attr
> Version: 2.4.32
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Arm eabi[1] has different syscall base than oldabi arm. Please
> include attached patch.
Hi Riku,
I had this atch merged upstream a little while back, but haven't had
a
Package: attr
Version: 2.4.32
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Arm eabi[1] has different syscall base than oldabi arm. Please
include attached patch.
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstabl
4 matches
Mail list logo