Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Kevin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-19 00:58]: > > That's what I've included. I added the man page for flash-apex as > > well. > > Please also remeber adding the dependency of devio to debian/control, > whithout which flash-apex is useless. Thank you. Good point! -- Martin Michlmayr http

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-18 Thread Kevin Price
Hey Marc, I'm sure you knew this but just as a reminder: > That's what I've included. I added the man page for flash-apex as > well. Please also remeber adding the dependency of devio to debian/control, whithout which flash-apex is useless. Thank you. -- Kevin Price http://www.kevin-price.de/

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-18 Thread Kevin Price
Hi Marc! > That's what I've included. I added the man page for flash-apex as > well. Thaks a lot! > I'd have been done, but my slug appears to need debhelper updating What version of debhelper is needed? If plain 5 is not enough, we should consider adding the correct build-dependency at le

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-18 Thread Marc Singer
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:28:08PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-18 14:01]: > > Let me see if I understand. You want 1.4.15 with Kevin's patch and > > nothing else? > > I believe Kevin's patch contains some changes we don't need. > > I think this one

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-18 14:09]: > What I'm going to probably do is roll back to the 1.4.15 release and > apply Kevin's patch. I'll also fixup the configurations so that the > EABI change is only in the armel config. AFAIK the EABI change/support was introdued in 1.15.xx, so

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-18 14:01]: > Let me see if I understand. You want 1.4.15 with Kevin's patch and > nothing else? I believe Kevin's patch contains some changes we don't need. I think this one is what we want: --- apex-1.4.xx.orig/debian/rules +++ apex-1.4.xx/debian/rule

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-18 Thread Marc Singer
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:15:26AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 18:27]: > > I'll upload a new version this weekend. > > Thanks, that'd be great. The base system is frozen alredy but I hope > we can get an exception for this APEX upload. However,

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-18 Thread Marc Singer
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:01:55PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-18 11:15]: > > * Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 18:27]: > > > I'll upload a new version this weekend. > > > > Thanks, that'd be great. The base system is frozen alredy

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-18 11:15]: > * Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 18:27]: > > I'll upload a new version this weekend. > > Thanks, that'd be great. The base system is frozen alredy but I hope > we can get an exception for this APEX upload. However, this me

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-18 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 18:27]: > I'll upload a new version this weekend. Thanks, that'd be great. The base system is frozen alredy but I hope we can get an exception for this APEX upload. However, this means you should make as few changes as possible. Can you please make

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-17 Thread Marc Singer
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 08:45:31PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-12 12:57]: > > A few changes to the postinst script. No need to hardocde /usr/sbin, > > this is always in the path when running a postinst script. #DEBHELPER# > > should be put in for debhe

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-12 12:57]: > A few changes to the postinst script. No need to hardocde /usr/sbin, > this is always in the path when running a postinst script. #DEBHELPER# > should be put in for debhelper's use. No need to test if flash-apex is > executable, it always will

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-05-12 Thread Joey Hess
A few changes to the postinst script. No need to hardocde /usr/sbin, this is always in the path when running a postinst script. #DEBHELPER# should be put in for debhelper's use. No need to test if flash-apex is executable, it always will be when dpkg runs postinst configure. #!/bin/sh set -e #DE

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-03-20 Thread Marc Singer
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 09:58:28PM -0700, Gordon Farquharson wrote: > > The patch below is my attempt at adding the flash-apex script and a > postinst script to the apex package. The diff is created between apex > version 1.5.13 and an imaginary version 1.5.14. > > Would it be possible for you to

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-03-05 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Hi Joey On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > diff -Naur apex-1.5.13/debian/postinst apex-1.5.14/debian/postinst > --- apex-1.5.13/debian/postinst 1969-12-31 17:00:00.0 -0700 > +++ apex-1.5.14/debian/postinst 2008-03-02 17:57:00.0 -0700

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2008-03-02 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Hi Marc On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 8:33 PM, Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to add the flash-apex script (submitted previously) to the > apex package, and have it run after apex is installed. Is this a good > idea? If so, is the postinst script the best way to achieve thi

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2007-10-29 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Hi Martin and Joey On 9/30/07, Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that we should ditch the patch, and include the attached > script (flash-apex) in the apex-nslu2 package. The script flashes the > file /boot/apex.flash to the FIS partition named "Loader". The script > would t

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2007-10-01 Thread Rod Whitby
Gordon Farquharson wrote: > The script has been tested on the NSLU2. It should probably also > include support for the NAS100D (assuming the NAS100D uses APEX with > Debian - I have CC'd Rod on this email to solicit comments from him). > Are we planning to have a apex-nas100d package? It's not pos

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2007-09-30 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Hi Martin On 9/28/07, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What's the status of this patch? I think that we should ditch the patch, and include the attached script (flash-apex) in the apex-nslu2 package. The script flashes the file /boot/apex.flash to the FIS partition named "Loader". T

Bug#421359: #421359 patch submitted

2007-09-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gordon Farquharson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-04 00:08]: > I submitted a patch for flash-kernel to address #421359. > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=421359 What's the status of this patch? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR