Hi Lucas,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Muammar El
Khatib wrote:
>>
>> Would you have time to port it to mpich2 1.1, or should I take a look?
>> Basically, if you can do the packaging work, and I only do the
>> review/sponsoring, that would be perfect.
>>
>
> Yes, I would, but When I port it, I
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Lucas
Nussbaum wrote:
> On 17/06/09 at 22:00 -0400, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
>> wrote:
>> > On 17/06/09 at 13:08 +1930, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>> >> OTOH, I think the debian/copyright file should be rechecked ag
On 17/06/09 at 22:00 -0400, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
> wrote:
> > On 17/06/09 at 13:08 +1930, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> >> OTOH, I think the debian/copyright file should be rechecked again. I
> >> don't have any problem in giving the work I've don
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 17/06/09 at 13:08 +1930, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
>> OTOH, I think the debian/copyright file should be rechecked again. I
>> don't have any problem in giving the work I've done, let others
>> maintain MPICH2, or co-maintain the package wi
Muammar, Lucas, and others,
Muammar: since you have the priority on this, can you let us know how you
want to proceed?
I have been working on it for some time. I started packaging it from
the work who other did (requesting his permission of using it
previously).
The package compiles, but it
On 17/06/09 at 13:08 +1930, Muammar El Khatib wrote:
> OTOH, I think the debian/copyright file should be rechecked again. I
> don't have any problem in giving the work I've done, let others
> maintain MPICH2, or co-maintain the package with debian-science. The
> important thing is that there is pe
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Pavan Balaji wrote:
>
> These emails seem to have been broken across two email chains; merging them
> here.
>
> Lucas: thanks for offering to help. I don't have a preference with who
> packages MPICH2. Either you or Muammar, or if needed I can package it
> (tho
These emails seem to have been broken across two email chains; merging
them here.
Lucas: thanks for offering to help. I don't have a preference with who
packages MPICH2. Either you or Muammar, or if needed I can package it
(though I might need some help if I'm doing it). Also, if either one
On 15/06/09 at 16:32 -0500, Pavan Balaji wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm one of the developers of MPICH at Argonne National Laboratory. As
> some of you might be aware, our current focus is mainly on the second
> generation of MPICH, i.e., MPICH2. I noticed that currently Debian only
> contains MPICH
9 matches
Mail list logo
