Hi, I've been asking Ubuntu to include AoTuv and was told that I should ask
for follow up on this Debian bug to see if the packages can be merged on
Debian's end. Is this possible?
Thanks.
Hi, Adeodato.
Thanks for your answer.
On Jul 08 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Rogério Brito [Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:55:52 -0300]:
>
> > Besides that, what do you mean with "these characteristics"? That it
> > is an "intrusive" patch?
>
> Intrusive, wishlist.
Would there then, be the possibility
* Rogério Brito [Sun, 08 Jul 2007 01:47:46 -0300]:
> As a matter of fact, we do know how Monty feels about the patch:
> http://people.xiph.org/~giles/2007/200702_meeting.txt
Which, in a nutshell, is: "The merge should be performed by a person
with knowledge and time to perform a careful review."
* Rogério Brito [Sat, 07 Jul 2007 19:55:52 -0300]:
> Besides that, what do you mean with "these characteristics"? That it is
> an "intrusive" patch?
Intrusive, wishlist.
> > Just for the record, these two were fixed in the Bazaar branch a week ago:
> > http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-xiph/libvorbis
Hi, Clint.
Thank you very much for replying.
On Jul 07 2007, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 07:55:52PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Besides that, what do you mean with "these characteristics"? That it is
> > an "intrusive" patch?
>
> Do we know what upstream's reaction to that p
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 07:55:52PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Besides that, what do you mean with "these characteristics"? That it is
> an "intrusive" patch?
Do we know what upstream's reaction to that patch is?
https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1166
suggests that we don't.
Hi there, Adeodato.
On Jul 07 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Rogério Brito [Sat, 07 Jul 2007 07:00:56 -0300]:
> > I have already packaged a private version of libvorbis with the aotuv
> > patch (which applies cleanly) and I also fixed some lintian warnings.
>
> > If some mentors are interested in
* Rogério Brito [Sat, 07 Jul 2007 07:00:56 -0300]:
> I have already packaged a private version of libvorbis with the aotuv
> patch (which applies cleanly) and I also fixed some lintian warnings.
> If some mentors are interested in what I did so far, I put the sources
> on my homepage:
> http://w
Hi, Fabio.
I'm including your detailed description of these improvements to
libvorbis so that people from the Debian Mentors mailing list may know
what this patch is about.
On Apr 18 2007, Fabio wrote:
> Would be nice to include aoTuV [1] patch to libvorbis. aoTuV is an
> improved libvorbis encod
forwarded 419890 https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1166
quit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libvorbis
Severity: wishlist
Version: 1.1.2.dfsg-1.2
Tags: patch
Would be nice to include aoTuV [1] patch to libvorbis. aoTuV is an
improved libvorbis encoder, that, while keeping ABI compatibility,
gives many improvement:
* better quality at all bitrates versus libvorbis-1.1.2 [2], giv
11 matches
Mail list logo
