Brice Goglin schreef:
> Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
>>Frans Pop schreef:
>>
>>
>>>The (new?) option "TargetRefresh" in the Monitor section could be a
>>>solution for that. A default value of 75 or even 100 would seem quite
>>>sensible to me. This would probably disable the highest resolutions,
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 10:00 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
> People can always change in runtime to a higher resolution.
Actually, that's not possible so far (without panning on a larger
virtual resolution initially), though it will be with RandR 1.2
and advanced acceleration architectures lik
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Frans Pop schreef:
>
>> The (new?) option "TargetRefresh" in the Monitor section could be a
>> solution for that. A default value of 75 or even 100 would seem quite
>> sensible to me. This would probably disable the highest resolutions, at
>> least on a lot of real
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Normally you use something conservative in such cases. Wy not make a
> default of maximum 1280x1024?
>
I am not sure it will be enough on old hardware, and Debian runs on lots
of old machines. The driver is already involved in the computation of
the default resolution
Brice Goglin schreef:
> Frans Pop wrote:
>
>>On Sunday 01 April 2007 14:39, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>>
>>
>>>A very high default resolution: 1920×1200
>>>I think this is the theoretical maximum the CRT monitor (IIyama
>>>HM903D/DT) and VGA card, but in practise it was not OK.
>>>I think it is b
Frans Pop schreef:
> (Please don't CC me on this BR, I'm not the submitter and I get them
> through the list anyway.)
>
> On Tuesday 10 April 2007 21:41, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>>It's hard to find a default value that would make all machines/users
>>happy.
>
>
> The (new?) option "TargetRefresh
(Please don't CC me on this BR, I'm not the submitter and I get them
through the list anyway.)
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 21:41, Brice Goglin wrote:
> It's hard to find a default value that would make all machines/users
> happy.
The (new?) option "TargetRefresh" in the Monitor section could be a
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 01 April 2007 14:39, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
>> A very high default resolution: 1920×1200
>> I think this is the theoretical maximum the CRT monitor (IIyama
>> HM903D/DT) and VGA card, but in practise it was not OK.
>> I think it is better to use a maximum default
On Sunday 01 April 2007 14:39, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> A very high default resolution: 1920×1200
> I think this is the theoretical maximum the CRT monitor (IIyama
> HM903D/DT) and VGA card, but in practise it was not OK.
> I think it is better to use a maximum default resolution of 1200x1024
> f
9 matches
Mail list logo
