tags 418123 +pending
thank you
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> etch has been release, so as far as I can see, there is no longer a
> reason to keep this Depends.
Looks good to me I just dropped the dependency in our git repo for Xorg
7.4 packages.
> Could you either drop it, or change it to a Suggests or
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:10:32PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Russell Coker wrote:
> > On Saturday 07 April 2007 17:46, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>> xutils should not depend on xutils-dev.
> >> I think it should, to ensure a smooth transition from sarge to etch.
> >> xutils-d
forcemerge 330751 418123
thank you
Russell Coker wrote:
> On Saturday 07 April 2007 17:46, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>> xutils should not depend on xutils-dev.
>> I think it should, to ensure a smooth transition from sarge to etch.
>> xutils-dev did not exist in sarge. xutils us
On Saturday 07 April 2007 17:46, Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > xutils should not depend on xutils-dev.
>
> I think it should, to ensure a smooth transition from sarge to etch.
> xutils-dev did not exist in sarge. xutils used to contain all what's in
> both xutils and xutils-dev now.
Russell Coker wrote:
> Package: xutils
> Version: 1:7.1.ds.3-1
> Severity: normal
>
> xutils should not depend on xutils-dev.
I think it should, to ensure a smooth transition from sarge to etch.
xutils-dev did not exist in sarge. xutils used to contain all what's in
both xutils and xutils-dev now.
Package: xutils
Version: 1:7.1.ds.3-1
Severity: normal
xutils should not depend on xutils-dev. Also xutils-dev should probably
depend on xutils.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /b
6 matches
Mail list logo
