* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-04 11:34]:
> Any objections to tagging this bug 'wontfix'?
Nope.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-04 11:34]:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 02.04.2007, 17:41 -0400 schrieb John W. Eaton:
> > I expect that some 2.9.x version of Octave will be declared the
> > recommended version of Octave before GCC 4.3 (or maybe even GCC 4.2)
> > is released, so I don't
Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.04.2007, 17:41 -0400 schrieb John W. Eaton:
> I expect that some 2.9.x version of Octave will be declared the
> recommended version of Octave before GCC 4.3 (or maybe even GCC 4.2)
> is released, so I don't have any plans to fix these problems in my
> 2.1.x sources. You're
* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-02 17:41]:
> I'd be much more interested in whether Octave 2.9.10 builds cleanly
> with GCC 4.2 and 4.3.
pkg-octave-devel: are you guys planning to upload 2.9.10? If so, I
can test it with 4.2 and 4.3.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
I expect that some 2.9.x version of Octave will be declared the
recommended version of Octave before GCC 4.3 (or maybe even GCC 4.2)
is released, so I don't have any plans to fix these problems in my
2.1.x sources. You're of course free to fix them in the Debian
packages.
I'd be much more interes
Package: octave2.1
Version: 1:2.1.73-13
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
Your package fails to build with GCC 4.3. Version 4.3 has not been
released yet but I'm building with a snapshot in order to find errors
and give people an advance warning. In GCC 4.3, the C++ header
dependencies have been cleaned u
6 matches
Mail list logo
