Hello!
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:28:13AM +0100, Nicolas François wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 09:05:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this is the correct behavior or not. I inherited it, and
> > I don't know if there's any documentation about what one is *supposed* to
> Philipp, does su seems to behave correctly when you remove the pam_end
> call in the child?
> My current opinion is that we should remove this pam_end, which would make
> the su behavior consistent with login. (BTW, does login behaves correctly
> regarding pam-krb5?)
Of course, that would be a
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 09:05:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if this is the correct behavior or not. I inherited it, and
> I don't know if there's any documentation about what one is *supposed* to
> to. It causes strange problems on Solaris 8 and 9 as well (I haven
3 matches
Mail list logo
