Bug#411695: A quick note...

2007-03-10 Thread Thomas Themel
Hi, Baruch Even ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2007-03-10: > I'm not even sure that it should go for robots.txt, the idea of websec > is that it behaves more like a browser, it doesn't crawl the website, it > doesn't try to go anywhere it's not directly instructed to and if a user > insists on misbeh

Bug#411695: A quick note...

2007-03-10 Thread Baruch Even
* Thomas Themel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070310 16:56]: > Hi, > > as Dani??l states, it would be nice if websec behaved like a proper web > robot. Baruch, are you aware that the change is basically a two-liner? I'm not even sure that it should go for robots.txt, the idea of websec is that it behaves

Bug#411695: A quick note...

2007-03-10 Thread Thomas Themel
Hi, as Daniƫl states, it would be nice if websec behaved like a proper web robot. Baruch, are you aware that the change is basically a two-liner? LWP, the web library you're using, provides a subclass of UserAgent that respects the robots.txt protocol, see here: http://search.cpan.org/dist/libww