On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:28:59 -0500, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Monday 05 February 2007 15:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:00:09 -0500, Filipus Klutiero
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > On Monday 05 February 2007 13:14, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> >> H
On Monday 05 February 2007 15:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:00:09 -0500, Filipus Klutiero
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Monday 05 February 2007 13:14, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> b) Changing the name would be mischaracterization of the
> >>
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:00:09 -0500, Filipus Klutiero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Monday 05 February 2007 13:14, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Hi,
> [...]
>> b) Changing the name would be mischaracterization of the
>> capabilities of the package
> Why?
Because linux is just one of the tar
On Monday 05 February 2007 13:14, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
[...]
> b) Changing the name would be mischaracterization of the
> capabilities of the package
Why?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel-package
Version: 10.066
Severity: wishlist
Since the introduction of linux-2.6, it would be more consistent to have
kernel-package named linux-package than kernel-package. Please rename
kernel-package to linux-package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
5 matches
Mail list logo