Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-08-15 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:19 +0100, Sam Morris wrote: > Hrm, then I wonder why they don't show up on gnome-screensaver-prefs... AFAIK, the xscreensaver hacks still needs to come with .desktop files for them to work with gnome-screensaver, see bug 410095. Unless this happens, it would probably be a

Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-08-15 Thread Sam Morris
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:41:22AM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 18:23 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > > I suggest you build gnome-screensaver without and with the changes and > > compare its number of dependencies. Otherwise, adding Recommends is > > okay. > > Hi, > > From

Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-02-05 Thread Loïc Minier
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > From what I can tell, gnome-screensaver is already built with support > for xscreensaver hacks: Then I was confused about some other support; for some reason I thought we were still missing GL support. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-02-05 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 18:23 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > I suggest you build gnome-screensaver without and with the changes and > compare its number of dependencies. Otherwise, adding Recommends is > okay. Hi, From what I can tell, gnome-screensaver is already built with support for xscreensav

Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-02-04 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > In the mean time, maybe we can activate support in gnome-screensaver and > only recommend xscreensaver-gl and rss-glx (a small change in the > Recommends of xscreensaver-gl is needed first)? This would at least > satisfy Xavier's request for gl hacks.

Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-02-04 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 00:24 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > FYI, I did have a look and decided not to include the stuff as it was > pulling way too many packages for people wanting a light weight > desktop. It would be nice if this could be split somehow, but I didn't > look into this yet. I thin

Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-02-04 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Sat, Feb 03, 2007, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > > Nothing special AFAIK, they're regular hacks. Please merge. > > But given the age of the original bug, you just ruined my hopes ... > I hope one of the maintainers will have a look at this once Etch is > released. FYI, I did have a look

Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-02-03 Thread Sven Arvidsson
merge 344559 409413 thanks On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 22:40 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: > Nothing special AFAIK, they're regular hacks. Please merge. > But given the age of the original bug, you just ruined my hopes ... I hope one of the maintainers will have a look at this once Etch is released. --

Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-02-03 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le samedi 03 février 2007 à 18:59 +0100, Sven Arvidsson a écrit : > Is anything special needed for the gl hacks? If not, I will merge your > request with the others for activating xscreensaver support. Nothing special AFAIK, they're regular hacks. Please merge. But given the age of the original b

Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-02-03 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 21:34 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: > Please add support for xscreensaver-gl hacks. Hi, Is anything special needed for the gl hacks? If not, I will merge your request with the others for activating xscreensaver support. (See bug 344559) -- Cheers, Sven Arvidsson http://www.

Bug#409413: gnome-screensaver: no GL hacks

2007-02-02 Thread Xavier Bestel
Package: gnome-screensaver Version: 2.16.2-1 Severity: wishlist Please add support for xscreensaver-gl hacks. Thanks, Xav -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh link