tags 409006 + pending
thanks
On June 3, 2008 at 12:59AM +0900,
tats (at debian.org) wrote:
> The Ubuntu pakcage suggested that the libgdk-pixbuf-dev dependency
> should be replaced with libimlib2-dev.
[...]
> If anyone don't make an objetion, I'll update the w3m package to
> use libimlib2-dev.
W
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 00:59:35 +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
> Julien, please tell me if you think that libgtk2.0-dev should be
> preferred to libimlib2-dev.
>
Whatever lets me remove gtk1.2 from my system works for me.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi,
On January 29, 2007 at 10:37PM +0100,
jcristau (at debian.org) wrote:
> w3m is currently built against gtk1.2 on all architectures, while former
> versions were built against gtk+2.0 on i386. This is probably due to
> gtk2 packages being installed on the maintainer's system but not on the
>
Package: w3m
Version: 0.5.1-5
Severity: important
Hi,
w3m is currently built against gtk1.2 on all architectures, while former
versions were built against gtk+2.0 on i386. This is probably due to
gtk2 packages being installed on the maintainer's system but not on the
NMUer's or on the buildds.
4 matches
Mail list logo