Hi Giuseppe,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:31:22PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 10/03/2007 alle 14.43 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> > Here's the final NMU diff for the NMU which I'm uploading. The NMU will be
> > uploaded to incoming shortly.
> [...]
> I prepared a new uploa
Il giorno sab, 10/03/2007 alle 14.43 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Here's the final NMU diff for the NMU which I'm uploading. The NMU will be
> uploaded to incoming shortly.
[...]
Hi Steve,
I prepared a new upload for this package too. It has been ready for one
week now sin
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:31:25AM -0500, Jamie ffolliott wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:10:47PM -0500, Jamie ffolliott wrote:
> > > Yes this works very well. Thank you.
> > > Can we get the same patch applied to libnss-ldap for the
> > same issues?
> > Which issues are you seeing with l
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:10:47PM -0500, Jamie ffolliott wrote:
> > Yes this works very well. Thank you.
>
> > Can we get the same patch applied to libnss-ldap for the
> same issues?
>
> Which issues are you seeing with libnss-ldap? From what I
> see, the only problem should be that ldapi:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:10:47PM -0500, Jamie ffolliott wrote:
> Yes this works very well. Thank you.
> Can we get the same patch applied to libnss-ldap for the same issues?
Which issues are you seeing with libnss-ldap? From what I see, the only
problem should be that ldapi:/// is mistaken fo
Yes this works very well. Thank you.
Can we get the same patch applied to libnss-ldap for the same issues?
> Jamie,
>
> Attached please find a patch which addresses the problems
> with pam_ldap.conf uri values being lost on upgrade. I'd
> welcome any testing you can give this patch to confir
BTW, while working on this bug, I also chased up another comment in the bug
log:
> The other issue is that you store a sensitive password (allowing write to
> the ldap directory) in debconf, without appropriate encryption - that
> stuff should generally not be stored and used to overwrite the
> pa
severity 407746 serious
tags 407746 patch
thanks
Jamie,
Attached please find a patch which addresses the problems with pam_ldap.conf
uri values being lost on upgrade. I'd welcome any testing you can give this
patch to confirm that it addresses the problem for you, but as it passes my
own tests (
This bug is important to the debian-edu subproject, as we precofigure
everything at install time, and uses NSS and PAM LDAP. Please let us
know if there is anything we can do to help.
Friendly,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
Member of the debian-edu subproject
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Package: libpam-ldap
Version: 180-1.4
After an apt-get upgrade, the libpam-ldap packate updated, and in doing so
it rewrote parts of the /etc/pam_ldap.conf file as follows
- rewrote host, base, ldap_version, pam_password
- commented out the "uri" setting.
Since I don't use unencrypted logins to m
10 matches
Mail list logo
