On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 05:13:51PM -0800, gary ng wrote:
> Is this in debian unstable ?
It is not: please use packages.debian.org to verify things like this.
> I am running etch and need a package that is in debian which is what
> my patch is against.
I am more than reluctant to package the curr
Is this in debian unstable ? I am running etch and
need a package that is in debian which is what my
patch is against.
--- Csaba Henk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:56:33PM -0800, Sebastien
> Delafond wrote:
> > tag 407695 + patch
> > Passing on this "quick" patch to upst
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:56:33PM -0800, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
> tag 407695 + patch
> Passing on this "quick" patch to upstream...
This patch is against a quite old version of fuse-python.
> > I see is the C wrapper of getattr still expect a 32 bit signed integer so it
> > cannot be returned
tag 407695 + patch
thanks
Passing on this "quick" patch to upstream...
--Seb
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:36:50PM +0800, gary ng wrote:
> Package: python-fuse
> Version: 2.5-5
> Followup-For: Bug #407695
>
> Below is a diff of the quick patch I made. It does not interfere with
> existing applicat
Package: python-fuse
Version: 2.5-5
Followup-For: Bug #407695
Below is a diff of the quick patch I made. It does not interfere with
existing applications if they work within the existing 2*31 -1 size limit. If
they do, the change would mean read/write/truncate would receive the correct
offset size
5 matches
Mail list logo
