> I've added module-assistant to "forcd1". build-essential was already
> included.
are the kernel headers for the standard debian kernels on CD1 as well? module
assistant isn't going to be much use without those.
On Sunday 21 January 2007 22:38, Joey Hess wrote:
> > If creation of a task is not an option, then please reassign to
> > debian-cd as IMO we should at least make sure that some of these
> > packages are available on the 1st CDs to enable people to build
> > custom kernels or modules after installa
Op 22-01-2007 om 12:46 schreef peter green:
> Joey Hess
> > This is why #266702 is still open. The fact that those default
> > C development tools are no longer in standard still doesn't make
> > "development" a sensible task. It's not the same class of thing as
> > running a web server or using a
> The problem with adding a development task has always been, and
> continues to be, that people do not use the same tools for development,
> and that there are no good defaults beyond basic C-style development
> tools.
mind you a similar thing applies to say the file server task, there are at
l
Frans Pop wrote:
> Recently the priority of a number of development packages was lowered from
> standard which means they are no longer installed by default. This is a
> good thing, but IMO it would be nice if these packages could be installed
> in an easy way using a Development task.
The prob
> The main challenge will be to get translations for the task, but possibly
> we can find existing translations somewhere.
Sigh.
/me prepares to a few weeks fighting to seek for the last
translations...:-|
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.66
Severity: wishlist
Recently the priority of a number of development packages was lowered from
standard which means they are no longer installed by default. This is a
good thing, but IMO it would be nice if these packages could be installed
in an easy way using a D
7 matches
Mail list logo
