> *If* d-i really creates /etc/networks then we actually have a problem,
> but I cannot find it on a newly-installed etch system.
> Can somebody authoritatively confirm or deny this?
Hmm. CCing d-boot when asking such questions would be appreciated (and
help getting authoritative answers :-)
net
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 19, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is exactly what this bug is about. I installed my system three
> > days ago, on 2007-01-16, using the daily build netinst.iso and I
> > did not create /etc/networks myself. My IP is static if
On Jan 19, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is exactly what this bug is about. I installed my system three
> days ago, on 2007-01-16, using the daily build netinst.iso and I
> did not create /etc/networks myself. My IP is static if you want
> to reproduce it (so I said no to DHCP et
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 19, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is also a conflict of interest with debian-installer,
> > who created this file.
>
> *If* d-i really creates /etc/networks then we actually have a problem,
This is exactly what this bug is abo
Package: netbase
Version: 4.28
Severity: serious
I see that /etc/networks has been added to netbase as a conffile.
This is very very bad, as policy says the conffile mechanism should
only be used when there is a default which may be used by everybody.
My /etc/networks was like this:
localnet 15
On Jan 19, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is very very bad, as policy says the conffile mechanism should
> only be used when there is a default which may be used by everybody.
The default entries look reasonably generic to me.
> My /etc/networks was like this:
>
> localnet 158.
6 matches
Mail list logo