Bug#405161: tasksel: inconsistency in task definition syntax

2007-01-02 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 21:04, you wrote: > Eh? The first syntax has not been used for some time (if ever) and is > not currently supported by tasksel. Are you thinking about this? > > Packages: list > foo > bar > baz Eh, yes sorry. Was writing from memory, but should have checked. > This i

Bug#405161: tasksel: inconsistency in task definition syntax

2007-01-02 Thread Joey Hess
Frans Pop wrote: > This is something I've been sitting on since the Dzongkha customization I > did in Bhutan. > > There are currently two ways to define tasks: > Packages: package-1 >package-2 >package-3 > and: > Packages: task-fields > Packages-list: >package-1 >package-2 >

Bug#405161: tasksel: inconsistency in task definition syntax

2007-01-01 Thread Frans Pop
Package: tasksel Version: 2.59 Severity: wishlist This is something I've been sitting on since the Dzongkha customization I did in Bhutan. There are currently two ways to define tasks: Packages: package-1 package-2 package-3 and: Packages: task-fields Packages-list: package-1 p