Bug#405011: Intent to hijack ITP for ledger

2008-07-10 Thread Trent W. Buck
owner 405011 Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 03:41:29PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:36:14PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: >> As I really want to see ledger in Debian, I am going to start >> working on a package of ledger of my own shortly. > >

Bug#405011: Intent to hijack ITP for ledger

2008-06-10 Thread Trent W. Buck
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:15:58PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: >> Finally, I seem to have lost my local packages; they may be sitting on >> my backup server at home. Found them, see attached. Format: 1.0 Source: ledger Version: 2.5-1 Binary: ledger, libledger-2.5, libledger-2.5-dev Maintainer: Tr

Bug#405011: Intent to hijack ITP for ledger

2008-06-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 03:41:29PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:36:14PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > As I really want to see ledger in Debian, I am going to start > > working on a package of ledger of my own shortly. Trent, if you are > > still interested in being t

Bug#405011: Intent to hijack ITP for ledger

2008-06-08 Thread Trent W. Buck
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:36:14PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > As I really want to see ledger in Debian, I am going to start > working on a package of ledger of my own shortly. Trent, if you are > still interested in being the maintainer of ledger, please contact > me ASAP. Hi, please do take

Bug#405011: Intent to hijack ITP for ledger

2008-06-08 Thread Matthew Palmer
Hi, I've noticed that nothing further appears to have been done to this ITP since the licence problem was mentioned in July last year. As I mentioned in January, I do not believe that the issue is a showstopper for inclusion in Debian, and I offered upload sponsorship if required. As I really wa