Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-31 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006, Mathias Brodala wrote: > But that’s exactly what I already did. And I cannot accomplish this since the > compiler is unable to find gdkwindow-x11.h. That was the reason I filed this > report. You might want to add "#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11" around your code if it is specifi

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-29 Thread Mathias Brodala
Hello Josselin. Josselin Mouette, 29.12.2006 18:27: > Le vendredi 29 décembre 2006 à 14:42 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : >> Alright, that did the trick. Now I only have one problem left. The build >> fails >> with the following error: > >>> cp: cannot stat `build-tree/gtk+-2.8.20-3~macmenubar

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-29 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 29 décembre 2006 à 14:42 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : > Alright, that did the trick. Now I only have one problem left. The build fails > with the following error: > > cp: cannot stat `build-tree/gtk+-2.8.20-3~macmenubar/NEWS': No such file or > > directory > > dh_installdocs: comm

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-29 Thread Mathias Brodala
Hello. Mathias Brodala, 29.12.2006 14:42: > The build fails > with the following error: > >> […] >> cp: cannot stat `build-tree/gtk+-2.8.20-3~macmenubar/NEWS': No such file or >> directory >> dh_installdocs: command returned error code 256 >> make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 A symlink solved thi

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-29 Thread Mathias Brodala
Hello Josselin. Josselin Mouette, 29.12.2006 11:00: > Le vendredi 29 décembre 2006 à 03:00 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : >> Last question for today (hm, ok tomorrow’s today now here): How do I disable >> the >> directFB build? > > Currently this is not easy. If you can't make your patch to ap

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-29 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 29 décembre 2006 à 03:00 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : > > This is the directFB variant of GTK+ breaking, as your patch is using > > direct X11 primitives instead of portable ones. I guess you have to > > disable the directFB build and build only the X11 variant. > > Last question f

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-28 Thread Mathias Brodala
Hello Josselin. Josselin Mouette, 29.12.2006 02:02: > Le vendredi 29 décembre 2006 à 01:31 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : >>> i486-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -Wall -o .libs/gtk-query-immodules-2.0 >>> queryimmodules.o ./.libs/libgtk-directfb-2.0.so >>> ../gdk-pixbuf/.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so ../gd

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 29 décembre 2006 à 01:31 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : > > You have to grab the GTK+ source: "apt-get source gtk+2.0" > > Then, rename the patch and add it in the debian/patches/ directory (or, > > if you're using the experimental package, import it with quilt). After > > which you c

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-28 Thread Mathias Brodala
Hello Josselin. Josselin Mouette, 29.12.2006 00:47: > Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 23:53 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : Do you have an idea how I could get this patch working? >>> What software is this product for? >> You can get the patch and details about it right here: >> >> http://www.

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-28 Thread Mathias Brodala
Hello Josselin. Josselin Mouette, 28.12.2006 23:29: > Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 10:57 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : >> Now if the gtkwindow-x11.[ch] are >> there in the source tree, shouldn’t they be in a package after compiling? Or >> do >> they just disappear? > > This is a private header

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 10:57 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : > > This header is a private one, which means functions declared inside are > > not part of the public API. If the patch is for GTK+ itself, you can > > find the header in the source, in gdk/x11. > > Indeed! I didn’t expect it to f

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-28 Thread Mathias Brodala
Hello Josselin. Josselin Mouette, 28.12.2006 10:07: > Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 01:19 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : >> I’m not sure if this really is a bug or whatever. I wanted to apply a >> patch which would enable a Mac-like menubar for all GTK based >> applications. In this patch a header

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 01:19 +0100, Mathias Brodala a écrit : > Package: libgtk2.0-dev > Version: 2.8.20-3 > Severity: normal > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I’m not sure if this really is a bug or whatever. I wanted to apply a > patch which would enable a Mac-like me

Bug#404754: libgtk2.0-dev: Missing gdkwindow-x11.h

2006-12-27 Thread Mathias Brodala
Package: libgtk2.0-dev Version: 2.8.20-3 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I’m not sure if this really is a bug or whatever. I wanted to apply a patch which would enable a Mac-like menubar for all GTK based applications. In this patch a header file named „gdkwindow-