severity 403641 important
thanks
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 07:36:10PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> do you consider the following scenario release-critical? If yes, we
> have more than one RC bug:
> - $packagemanager install B X
> - package A is unpacked
> - package B which Depends: A is unpacked
>
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is --quiet only used for update-updmap? It's the same script behind
> the three, and with "-v" it always says
IMHO, it's a bug that --quiet isn't used for all three calls. But this
--quiet here dates from before we introduced
dhit_check_run_without_e
Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact, this problem is taken care of by the dh_installtex snippets,
> and the approach is closer to "ignore errors but display a warning" than
> to "run the commands iff tex-common is configured, not ignoring errors":
>
> ,[ From lmodern's current
In fact, this problem is taken care of by the dh_installtex snippets,
and the approach is closer to "ignore errors but display a warning" than
to "run the commands iff tex-common is configured, not ignoring errors":
,[ From lmodern's current postrm ]
| case "$1" in
| remove|disappear)
|
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, I'm not sure how to fix this. There's a reason why
> the update-* scripts fail (with an understandable error message) when
> the basic file is missing - so this shouldn't be changed. Should we
> really ignore all errors of update-* in
Dear Release Managers,
do you consider the following scenario release-critical? If yes, we
have more than one RC bug:
- $packagemanager install B X
- package A is unpacked
- package B which Depends: A is unpacked
- package X which is unrelated is tried to unpack, but fails (e.g. a
file conflic
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 06:33:21PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: tetex-base
> > Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-3
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that you can't uninstall the package if things aren't set up
> > properly.
>
> Hm, yes. Wh
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-3
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that you can't uninstall the package if things aren't set up
> properly.
Hm, yes. What happens is:
- tex-common is unpacked
- tetex-base is unpacked
- the install run fa
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that you can't uninstall the package if things aren't set up
properly.
>From the buildd log I see:
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-base.
Unpacking tetex-base (from .../tetex-base_3.0.dfsg.3-3_all.deb) ...
[...
9 matches
Mail list logo
