Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:21, Loïc Minier wrote:
I've uploaded these debs to unstable.
OK, thanks. That means that we can get some more testing in before
requesting migration.
Let's hope that with Lenny we can switch to a truly integrated 2.10 soon.
I strongly agre
Le jeudi 11 janvier 2007 à 18:30 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit :
> On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:21, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > I've uploaded these debs to unstable.
>
> OK, thanks. That means that we can get some more testing in before
> requesting migration.
>
> Let's hope that with Lenny we can swit
On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:21, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I've uploaded these debs to unstable.
OK, thanks. That means that we can get some more testing in before
requesting migration.
Let's hope that with Lenny we can switch to a truly integrated 2.10 soon.
Cheers,
FJP
pgpEPHH5c3ZSd.pgp
Descr
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> I have tested the udeb from that location by rebuilding the installer with
> as only change that udeb, and I can confirm that the memory leaks are
> (almost?) completely gone. I have done a full installation and not
> noticed any regressions or problems.
Hi Loïc,
Again our thanks for your quick and excellent response.
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 20:12, Loïc Minier wrote:
> It's not trivial to backport, the upstream 2.10 code doesn't map so
> well with our 2.8.20 with backported directfb and I think it wouldn't
> be possible to pull the 2.10 dir
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Just wanted to say the patch was eventually committed to gnome svn [1]:
i tried a backport to our 2.8.20 but was unable to due to that complex
set of patches already present :(
Would be possible building an experimental 2-8-20
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Just wanted to say the patch was eventually committed to gnome svn [1]:
> i tried a backport to our 2.8.20 but was unable to due to that complex
> set of patches already present :(
> Would be possible building an experimental 2-8-20 udeb with this
Hi
Just wanted to say the patch was eventually committed to gnome svn [1]:
i tried a backport to our 2.8.20 but was unable to due to that complex
set of patches already present :(
Would be possible building an experimental 2-8-20 udeb with this patch
to see what its effects are?
thanks
Atti
8 matches
Mail list logo
