tags #403583 - moreinfo unreproducible
tags #403583 confirmed pending
thanks
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:01:18PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> I'd like people to test this whether it introduces any regression
> before I commit to svn and upload.
No negative feedback until now. Committing to svn.
Gre
tags #403583 - moreinfo unreproducible
tags #403583 confirmed
thanks
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 10:10:36AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:19:39AM -0500, celejar wrote:
> > On 1/3/07, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >* is a catchall, I have verified this in a test setu
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:30:45 +0100
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I am somewhat "at the end of my latin" here, since I cannot reproduce
> the bug. If you are on Debian etch or Debian sid (which your original
> bug report suggested), please try purging exim (you'll probably need
> -
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:05:09AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:10:36 +0100
> Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (a)
> > verify that your passwd.client line is formatted like:
> > *:username:clear-text-password
> >
>
> The debugging output I sent was made with the passwd.c
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:10:36 +0100
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:19:39AM -0500, celejar wrote:
> > On 1/3/07, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >* is a catchall, I have verified this in a test setup with a smarthost
> > >that had its reverse DNS delibera
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:19:39AM -0500, celejar wrote:
> On 1/3/07, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* is a catchall, I have verified this in a test setup with a smarthost
> >that had its reverse DNS deliberatelybroken.
> >
> >You only need to put the IP address in passwd.client if you ha
On 1/3/07, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
* is a catchall, I have verified this in a test setup with a smarthost
that had its reverse DNS deliberatelybroken.
You only need to put the IP address in passwd.client if you have
specified a host name with broken reverse DNS there as th
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 09:17:49AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> Thanks very much for clearing this up. The documentation
> [exim4-config_files(5)] currently reads:
>
> > server with the canonical host name target.mail.server.example. Many
> > ISPs provide only an alias name of their SMTP smarthost. Yo
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 12:14:59 +0100
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 11:41:05PM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> > gmail-smtp.l.google.com [64.233.185.109]:587 status = usable
> > 64.233.185.109 in serialize_hosts? no (option unset)
> > delivering 1GyKob-n7-56 to gmail-smt
tags #403583 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 04:07:17AM -0500, Celejar wrote:
> Exim is set to relay outgoing mail through a smarthost (smtp.gmail.com
> a.k.a gmail-smtp.l.google.com) which requires the client to authenticate
> via TLS. Exim is configured to do so, and /etc/
Package: exim4
Version: 4.63-2
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Exim is set to relay outgoing mail through a smarthost (smtp.gmail.com
a.k.a gmail-smtp.l.google.com) which requires the client to authenticate
via TLS. Exim is configured to do so, and /etc/exim4/pass
11 matches
Mail list logo
