You have won $552,000.00,just send your name,tel,country
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 25/09/08 at 12:21 -0400, Joseph Method wrote:
> Can we reconsider the status of this ticket in light of the proposal on
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgems-ruby/+bug/145267 ?
>
> As I understand it, Neil Wilson patches Rubygems to link files into
> /usr/local/bin and uses the al
Can we reconsider the status of this ticket in light of the proposal on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgems-ruby/+bug/145267 ?
As I understand it, Neil Wilson patches Rubygems to link files into
/usr/local/bin and uses the alternatives system to decide whether to load
ruby1.9 or ruby
retitle 403407 rubygems: gems are installed in /var/lib/gems/X.Y/bin, which is
not in $PATH
severity 403407 wishlist
tags 403407 + wontfix
thanks
On 04/07/07 at 19:59 +0200, Renaud Morvan wrote:
> There is another issue related to this situation in current stable etch.
>
> Gems bin are located in
There is another issue related to this situation in current stable etch.
Gems bin are located in /var/lib/gems/1.8/bin/ which means that they
can't be accessed easily with sudo which seems to be compiled with
secure-path that hardcode PATH env variable
It leads to buggy situation with some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, Morten
Sorry for the late reply.
Morten Bojsen-Hansen wrote:
> It seems that this package does not add the gems bin to PATH in
> /etc/profiles, which I am quite sure it should. At least it failed to do
> so on my system, described below. It shoul
Package: rubygems
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: normal
It seems that this package does not add the gems bin to PATH in
/etc/profiles, which I am quite sure it should. At least it failed to do
so on my system, described below. It should have added
/var/lib/gems/X.Y/bin to PATH.
I realized this when I
7 matches
Mail list logo
