Bug#402289: bochsbios

2007-02-23 Thread BUCHMULLER Norbert
Hi, I had the same problem (but that's no news:-). What do you think, is there any chance to have a fully working (ie. -kernel-kqemu working) QEMU in Etch? (Eg. by means of pushing a new qemubios package to Etch, or some other way.) Best regards, norbi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Bug#402289: bochsbios

2007-02-15 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 09:04:31AM -0500, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 18:09 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > bochsbios is part of the bochs source package, so Bochs is always going > > to be in proper sync with it, no matter what we do. > > > > So, why not just updating bochs to

Bug#402289: bochsbios

2007-02-15 Thread Marc Deslauriers
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 18:09 +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > bochsbios is part of the bochs source package, so Bochs is always going > to be in proper sync with it, no matter what we do. > > So, why not just updating bochs to CVS version? Actually, after investigating a little further, it's not that

Bug#402289: bochsbios

2007-02-14 Thread Robert Millan
bochsbios is part of the bochs source package, so Bochs is always going to be in proper sync with it, no matter what we do. So, why not just updating bochs to CVS version? Can we reassign this bug to bochsbios? -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only int