On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 08:17:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:47:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > With the fixed xulrunner packages I successfully compiled
> > > epiphany-browser and with the few websites I tested it even seems to
> > > wor
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:47:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > With the fixed xulrunner packages I successfully compiled
> > epiphany-browser and with the few websites I tested it even seems to
> > work fine.
>
> Tha patch contains a bad bugzilla bug reference. Could you point to the
> real one,
Hi,
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Tha patch contains a bad bugzilla bug reference. Could you point to the
> real one, please ;)
What do you mean? I changed it to the bts number of the orignal report
with the first version of the patch.
bye, Roman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:40:24PM +0100, Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Package: xulrunner
> Version: 1.8.0.8-1
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently epiphany-browser fails to build as seen here:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=epiphany-browser&ver=2.14.
Package: xulrunner
Version: 1.8.0.8-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi,
Currently epiphany-browser fails to build as seen here:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=epiphany-browser&ver=2.14.3-3&arch=m68k&stamp=1163307325&file=log
The problem is the XPTC_InvokeByIndex() function, gcc can as
5 matches
Mail list logo