On Mar 30, Tom Metro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so that suggests that tftpd should be adjusted to depend on
> inet-superserver, but that doesn't explain why netbase has a direct
> dependency on openbsd-inetd, or why we have both inet-superserver and
> netkit-inetd virtual packages that se
Marco d'Itri wrote:
Tom Metro wrote:
Why do we have two virtual packages serving the same purpose? I'm guessing
one is being phased out and replaced by the other.
Yes. Packages should depend on openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver because
post-etch the dependency from netbase will be removed..
O
On Mar 30, Tom Metro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do we have two virtual packages serving the same purpose? I'm guessing
> one is being phased out and replaced by the other.
Yes. Packages should depend on openbsd-inetd | inet-superserver because
post-etch the dependency from netbase will be r
Philippe Wilson wrote:
Although the tftpd package is installed and configured to launch from
inetd, it does not Recommend that an inetd server be installed.
It looks to me like this has been resolved.
According to:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/tftpd
there is a dependency on netbase
Package: tftpd
Version: 0.17-15
Severity: normal
Install tftpd on a system with no other need for an inetd server and it will
install, but not be usable until an inetd server is manually installed.
Although the tftpd package is installed and configured to launch from inetd,
it does not Recommend
5 matches
Mail list logo
