> > I think that update-ms-fonts should have some guard against
> > re-entrancy.
>
> I'm not opposed to the idea, but am not implementing it before etch -
> the scenario is not that common and I don't want to risk destabilisation
> now.
Sure.
> Were there any adverse effects of the parallel runs?
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 15:51 +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> I think that update-ms-fonts should have some guard against re-entrancy.
I'm not opposed to the idea, but am not implementing it before etch -
the scenario is not that common and I don't want to risk destabilisation
now.
Were there
Package: msttcorefonts
Version: 1.2
Severity: minor
With current version of msttcodefonts, /usr/sbin/update-ms-fonts could
be easylly called several times in parallel. This just happened for me,
with the following (not so unlikely) scenario:
- apt-get install msttcorefonts,
- downloading fonts f
3 matches
Mail list logo
