Hi,
Below is the review of mass upgrade experiment as previously done.
Then I found
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=391377
Even new aptitude has issue with Conflicts/Replaces/Provides.
If we were to do manual work, why not making process simple by trimming
system first in kno
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:53:56PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:12:46PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 December 2006 15:25, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > So far the only working method I've been able to find to upgrade that is
> > to use aptitude interactively (i.e. th
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:12:46PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 02 December 2006 15:25, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> So far the only working method I've been able to find to upgrade that is
> to use aptitude interactively (i.e. the frontend, not from the
> commandline).
I tried
vim /e/a/sorces.
Hi,
Let me do experiment and thinking.
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:12:46PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 02 December 2006 15:25, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > REFERENCE DATA:
> > # aptitude -y -s -f --without-recommends install aptitude
^^
This
On Saturday 02 December 2006 15:25, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> REFERENCE DATA:
> # aptitude -y -s -f --without-recommends install aptitude
> ...
> 8 packages upgraded, 17 newly installed, 0 to remove and 118 not
> upgraded. Need to get 0B/11.9MB of archives. After unpacking 19.6MB
> will be used.
>
> Th
Package: release-notes
Version: etch-cvs-20061201
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I understand "Chapter 4 - Upgrades from previous releases" gives generic
description for upgrade and it has been recommending to use aptitude.
But its contents looks still just as the result of s/apt-get/aptitude/
and
6 matches
Mail list logo
