On 12/2/06, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To avoid possible confusions, I added the full file as well. This is
> assume to be used with Splashy 0.2.1.
Wouldn't be better to release 0.2.2 ASAP?
I have no problem with this idea. I'll start a branc
Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To avoid possible confusions, I added the full file as well. This is
> assume to be used with Splashy 0.2.1.
Wouldn't be better to release 0.2.2 ASAP?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
Otavio,
I found other bugs in splashy-update-progress-steps. This patch fixes
those bugs as well. Please disregard the patch I sent before for that
file (see Bug # 400598 on DBTS).
To avoid possible confusions, I added the full file as well. This is
assume to be used with Splashy 0.2.1.
The ide
Thanks for reporting this Bug.
Otavio, please see attached patches.
On 12/1/06, Ratiu Petru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: splashy
Version: 0.2.1
Followup-For: Bug #400598
RUNLEVEL is set by init(8) for all its children, but when init scripts
are run interactively, the variable isn't the
Package: splashy
Version: 0.2.1
Followup-For: Bug #400598
RUNLEVEL is set by init(8) for all its children, but when init scripts
are run interactively, the variable isn't there anymore.
An alternative solution for finding the current runlevel might be the
use of runlevel(8), which outputs the eq
5 matches
Mail list logo