On November 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> We should probably clarify it with the dspam developers, but dspam
> seems to be currently stalled, for one reason or another.
>
> Any idea why?
If you mean upstream dspam development seems to be stalled, it seems
that way to me, too. Jonathan Zdziarski
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 11:35:53PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On November 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > Yikes! i wish i'd noticed that earlier. Is it documented anywhere
> > else that anyone knows?
>
> in /usr/share/doc/dspam/README.gz, i just noticed that in one part it
> claims t
On November 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Yikes! i wish i'd noticed that earlier. Is it documented anywhere
> else that anyone knows?
in /usr/share/doc/dspam/README.gz, i just noticed that in one part it
claims the hash driver is threadsafe:
Driver Requirements
Package: dspam
Version: 3.6.8-4
Severity: important
Debian currently ships dspam with only the default set of hash storage
drivers.
We also ship /etc/init.d/dspam, which is designed to run dspam in
daemon mode (though it is initally disabled in /etc/default/dspam).
Buried in the /usr/share/doc/d
4 matches
Mail list logo
