Bug#398677: nvidia-glx fixups

2006-11-14 Thread Randall Donald
> Actually, this is what it looks like when I try to reinstall libgl1-mesa-glx > (the nvidia-glx diversions cause this package to create a broken link in > /usr/lib/nvidia). > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 425320 2006-10-13 03:55 libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-11-14 20:06 l

Bug#398677: nvidia-glx fixups

2006-11-14 Thread Randall Donald
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 19:53 -0800, C.Y.M wrote: > > > I'm sorry, I didnt understand the proper function of a "diversion". So if a > package tries to install one of the "diverted" files, it gets placed in > /usr/lib/nvidia (with an xlibmesa extension). > Yes. > So, the libraries in /usr/lib/nv

Bug#398677: nvidia-glx fixups

2006-11-14 Thread C.Y.M
> > So, the libraries in /usr/lib/nvidia are not really used, but kept to store > the > "diverted" file? I guess I got confused when I saw this in /usr/lib/nvidia: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 425320 2006-10-13 03:55 libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2006-11-14 08:53 libGL.so

Bug#398677: nvidia-glx fixups

2006-11-14 Thread C.Y.M
> >> 2) A diversion is created and referenced to /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 (but this >> link >> is never created in /usr/lib). > I'm not sure what you are getting at here. /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 from > libgl1-mesa-glx is diverted to /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa > which shows up if libgl1-me

Bug#398677: nvidia-glx fixups

2006-11-14 Thread Randall Donald
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 16:19 -0800, C.Y.M wrote: > Package: nvidia-glx-dev > Version: 1.0.8776-1 > > There are a few minor bugs that should be cleaned up in the debian packaging > scripts for nvidia. > > 1) nvidia-glx-dev.links and nvidia-glx-dev.links.in create malformed links > because a "#" exi

Bug#398677: nvidia-glx fixups

2006-11-14 Thread C.Y.M
Package: nvidia-glx-dev Version: 1.0.8776-1 There are a few minor bugs that should be cleaned up in the debian packaging scripts for nvidia. 1) nvidia-glx-dev.links and nvidia-glx-dev.links.in create malformed links because a "#" exists before the link name in the links file. Also, the second li