On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 08:27:49AM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> >
> >Please find attached a patch to enable FFI closure on ARM, based on the
> >GCC code.
> >
> >The support was actually added to GCC 6 months ago. Why ctypes needs to
> >use its own version of the code instead of using the share
Please find attached a patch to enable FFI closure on ARM, based on the
GCC code.
The support was actually added to GCC 6 months ago. Why ctypes needs to
use its own version of the code instead of using the shared library? It
would benefit for fixes and improvements like this one.
Thanks, I'll
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 10:23:55AM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> Wookey wrote:
> > Package: ctypes
> > Version: 1.0.0-1
> >
> > Arm is explicitly not supported in debian/control
> >
> > Code for arm exists in the package. However it does not currently
> > build (which is presumably why i
Wookey wrote:
> Package: ctypes
> Version: 1.0.0-1
>
> Arm is explicitly not supported in debian/control
>
> Code for arm exists in the package. However it does not currently
> build (which is presumably why it is not enabled).
>
> Does upstream expect the arm support to be functional so it is m
Package: ctypes
Version: 1.0.0-1
Arm is explicitly not supported in debian/control
Code for arm exists in the package. However it does not currently
build (which is presumably why it is not enabled).
Does upstream expect the arm support to be functional so it is merely
a matter of fixing the bui
5 matches
Mail list logo
