On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 12:37:56AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Monday, November 6, 2006 8:42 pm, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > > test -n "${IF_UML_PROXY_ARP}" || exit 0
> > > test -n "${IF_UML_PROXY_ETHER}" || exit 0
> >
> > So we have 2 undocumented options for /etc/network/interface
On Monday, November 6, 2006 8:42 pm, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > 1) Is it necessary to have sysctl verbose?
> Well, I'd say yes. If for no other reason, to tell the user what we are
> doing.
Still, are other entries in the interfaces verbose like that? One can
expect that the admin who wrote the
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:25:32PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: uml-utilities
> Version: 20060323-3
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> 1) Is it necessary to have sysctl verbose?
Well, I'd say yes. If for no other reason, to tell the user what we are
doing.
> 2) I believe it is a
Package: uml-utilities
Version: 20060323-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
1) Is it necessary to have sysctl verbose?
2) I believe it is a good practice to restore the previous situation as much
as possible after the work is done.
--- /etc/network/if-up.d/uml-utilities 2006-04-14 20:58:37.000
4 matches
Mail list logo