On 31/10/06 at 17:12 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> severity 396435 minor
> thanks
>
> [Lucas Nussbaum]
> > Not allowing to build as root is a bad idea.
>
> Why do you, or anyone, need to build packages as root? It's a bad idea
> in general. For example, a former version of Samba actually g
severity 396435 minor
thanks
[Lucas Nussbaum]
> Not allowing to build as root is a bad idea.
Why do you, or anyone, need to build packages as root? It's a bad idea
in general. For example, a former version of Samba actually gets
incorrect 'configure' values if configure is run as root.
> You
severity 396435 important
retitle 396435 subversion: should be buildable as root (failed test when built
as root)
thanks
On 31/10/06 at 15:52 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Lucas Nussbaum]
> > During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your
> > package failed to build on i38
[Lucas Nussbaum]
> During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your
> package failed to build on i386.
Don't build subversion as root.
Can I close this bug?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: subversion
Version: 1.4.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in etch, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
Relevant parts:
Running all tests in getopt_tests.py..
5 matches
Mail list logo
