On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:34 +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> ImageMagick indirectly suggests to install the gsfonts package. (It
> suggests to install gs which depends on gs-gpl which recommends gsfonts.)
> That's probably too weak a link, and we should add an explicit
> Recommends or Suggests on gsfo
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:11:25AM -0600, Richard Laager wrote:
> Regarding one of our web servers, a co-worker of mine filed an internal
> bug with this text:
>
> > ImageMagick fonts don't get properly configured -- this seems like it
> > may be a package bug to me, though I'm not sure.
> > Basic
Package: libmagick9
Version: 6:6.2.4.5-0.6
Regarding one of our web servers, a co-worker of mine filed an internal
bug with this text:
> ImageMagick fonts don't get properly configured -- this seems like it
> may be a package bug to me, though I'm not sure.
> Basically /usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.2.4/
3 matches
Mail list logo