> Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > In my opinion the severity of this bug should be critical: It breaks
> > installation of unrelated software. Just to show some logs:
>
> I prefer for my general sanity, to not call all packages that BUILD
> using debhelper "unrelated" for the purpose of determining
severity 395954 serious
thanks
As a blitz++ bug, I'm pretty sure this does warrant being RC, since it
does break the package install and leave the system in a semi-hosed
state.
BTW, while working on this bug, I was able to reproduce it, but not
reliably every time. My NMUed version seems fine.
-
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> In my opinion the severity of this bug should be critical: It breaks
> installation of unrelated software. Just to show some logs:
I prefer for my general sanity, to not call all packages that BUILD
using debhelper "unrelated" for the purpose of determining whether
debh
Hi all!
In my opinion the severity of this bug should be critical: It breaks
installation of unrelated software. Just to show some logs:
Setting up blitz++ (0.9-1) ...
Nested quantifiers in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/Blitz++ <-- HERE library/
at /usr/sbin/install-info line 360.
Later on, t
4 matches
Mail list logo
