Bug#395573: Visit: License Problems with SILO

2010-10-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 20:27:48 +0100 Alastair McKinstry wrote: [...] > Congrats! Thanks, but I think you should really send congratulations and thanks to LLNL for freeing Silo: I've just done some little "pushing" in the right direction... ;-) > I've filed the ITP, but the actual packaging may t

Bug#395573: Visit: License Problems with SILO

2010-10-10 Thread Alastair McKinstry
On 2010-10-10 18:43, Francesco Poli wrote: On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:10:07 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:34:31 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:20:57 +0100 Alastair McKinstry wrote: [...] I've been looking at packaging SILO, a mandatory dependency o

Bug#395573: Visit: License Problems with SILO

2010-10-10 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:10:07 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:34:31 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > > [...] > > On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:20:57 +0100 Alastair McKinstry wrote: > [...] > > > I've been looking at packaging SILO, a mandatory dependency of VisIt. > [...] > > This seems

Bug#395573: Visit: License Problems with SILO

2009-11-07 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:18:39 + Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Hi, > > I contacted VisIt's upstream (via visit-users list) and found the same > thing; they are > correcting the build notes that claim Silo is needed. Great! :-) > > I hadn't tested it without Silo. I'm trying to build it now,

Bug#395573: Visit: License Problems with SILO

2009-11-07 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi, I contacted VisIt's upstream (via visit-users list) and found the same thing; they are correcting the build notes that claim Silo is needed. I hadn't tested it without Silo. I'm trying to build it now, but Visit 1.12.0 needs VTK 5.0.0c : I tested against vtk 5.2 which is in Debian, and

Bug#395573: Visit: License Problems with SILO

2009-11-07 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:34:31 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:20:57 +0100 Alastair McKinstry wrote: [...] > > I've been looking at packaging SILO, a mandatory dependency of VisIt. [...] > This seems to be very awkward: a Free Software application (VisIt) > which links wit

Bug#395573: Visit: License Problems with SILO

2009-10-31 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:34:31 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:20:57 +0100 Alastair McKinstry wrote: [...] > > I've been looking at packaging SILO, a mandatory dependency of VisIt. > > Unfortunately, it contains the following license clause: > > > > Commercialization

Bug#395573: Visit: License Problems with SILO

2009-10-31 Thread Francesco Poli
retitle 395573 RFP: visit -- interactive parallel visualization and graphical analysis tool noowner 395573 thanks On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:20:57 +0100 Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Hi, Hi! > > I've been looking at packaging SILO, a mandatory dependency of VisIt. > Unfortunately, it contains the f

Bug#395573: Visit: License Problems with SILO

2009-10-24 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi, I've been looking at packaging SILO, a mandatory dependency of VisIt. Unfortunately, it contains the following license clause: Commercialization of this product is prohibited without notifying the Department of Energy (DOE) or Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). AFAIK