Richard Thrippleton wrote:
> OK. The implication is that ntp should be the longterm maintainer of
> time. Is this appropriate for a system with patchy network
> connectivity that isn't turned on a lot of the time (specifically, my
> laptop)? I thought the answer to this was "no", so I just had ntpd
On Tue Oct 10 14:59, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Richard Thrippleton wrote:
> > As of a recent package upgrade, ntpdate no longer includes the script
> > in init.d to update the time.
>
> That is intentional. Read NEWS.Debian.
OK. The implication is that ntp should be the longterm maintainer of tim
Richard Thrippleton wrote:
> As of a recent package upgrade, ntpdate no longer includes the script
> in init.d to update the time.
That is intentional. Read NEWS.Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ntpdate
Version: 1:4.2.2+dfsg.2-3
Severity: important
As of a recent package upgrade, ntpdate no longer includes the script in init.d
to update the time. I've had to modify scripts in order to keep my use ntpdate
working.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT pre
4 matches
Mail list logo
