Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm

2007-04-19 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-14 23:25]: > * Richard B. Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-14 22:14]: > > Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package > > compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.) > > It compiles fine on my ARM box

Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm

2006-10-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Richard B. Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-14 22:14]: > Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package > compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.) It compiles fine on my ARM box with -O2, using 4.1.1-13+b1 and 4.1.1-16. I suspect a temporary pro

Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm

2006-10-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Richard B. Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-14 22:14]: > Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package > compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.) This is not necesarily a compiler error. GCC might just be running out of memory or something. An

Bug#392054: ginac: FTBFS on arm

2006-10-14 Thread Richard B. Kreckel
Setting CXXFLAGS to -O instead of -O2 at least makde the package compile. (I don't suppose that g++-4.1_4.1.1-16 made a difference.) See -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub