Bug#390190: texlive-base: Better dependency chains

2019-07-17 Thread Hilmar Preuße
reassign 390190 texlive-fonts-extra tags 390190 + pending stop On 17.07.19 04:22, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: >> - texlive-fonts-extra dep on texlive-fonts-recommended >> - texlive-generic-extra dep on texlive-generic-recommended > > I can imagine people h

Bug#390190: texlive-base: Better dependency chains

2019-07-16 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > - texlive-fonts-extra dep on texlive-fonts-recommended > - texlive-generic-extra dep on texlive-generic-recommended I can imagine people having only extra installed without recommended, for very specific purposes. So leaving out, but also adding the deps

Bug#390190: texlive-base: Better dependency chains

2019-07-15 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 29.09.06 19:25, Frank Küster wrote: Hi Frank, hi Norbert, > I was just trying to suggest proper dependencies for debiandoc-sgml, as > an alternative to teTeX, and wondered why texlive-latex-extra does not > depend on texlive-latex-recommended. This means that a package that > needs files from

Bug#390190: texlive-base: Better dependency chains

2006-09-30 Thread Frank Küster
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all! > > On Fre, 29 Sep 2006, Frank Küster wrote: >> texlive-latex-base < texlive-latex-recommended < texlive-latex-extra, >> and no one would only want -extra without recommended. >> >> Obviously this was wrong - why? > > Cross installation on w

Bug#390190: texlive-base: Better dependency chains

2006-09-29 Thread Norbert Preining
On Fre, 29 Sep 2006, Norbert Preining wrote: > Contra i fascisti Vincerà la destra! I must be completely drunken ... Let's hope that this will not happen, more the other way round. But then again, maybe the reality was speaking from these words, Unfortunately. Best wishes Norbert --

Bug#390190: texlive-base: Better dependency chains

2006-09-29 Thread Norbert Preining
Hi all! On Fre, 29 Sep 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > texlive-latex-base < texlive-latex-recommended < texlive-latex-extra, > and no one would only want -extra without recommended. > > Obviously this was wrong - why? Cross installation on with teTeX? If you want to install tl-latex-extra on tetex

Bug#390190: texlive-base: Better dependency chains

2006-09-29 Thread Frank Küster
Package: texlive-base Version: 2005.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal I was just trying to suggest proper dependencies for debiandoc-sgml, as an alternative to teTeX, and wondered why texlive-latex-extra does not depend on texlive-latex-recommended. This means that a package that needs files from both pa