* Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061127 15:20]:
> I upgraded the severity with permission from Steve.
Yes. Nobody said you did something wrong.
> As far as I am concerned, this is not a release goal, just basic
> sanity of the distribution, much like checking packages actually
> build from
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:42:17AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> severity 389934 important
> thanks
I upgraded the severity with permission from Steve.
> * Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061126 07:27]:
> > However, the best course of action is to fix these bugs for Etch so that
> > the relea
severity 389934 important
thanks
* Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061126 07:27]:
> However, the best course of action is to fix these bugs for Etch so that
> the release team does not have to make such compromise between
> stability and security. It is possible to achieve that thanks to lint
Hi Bill,
On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 07:13:14PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 02:31:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> > severity 389934 important
> I don't see how you reached this conclusion. Users
severity 389934 serious
thanks
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 04:24:22AM -080O0, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> So my own opinion is that this class of bug should not be RC, at least when
> the embedded rpath doesn't lie in an obviously user-writable space such as
> /home or /tmp. If you feel stro
5 matches
Mail list logo
