On Tuesday 23 October 2007, dann frazier wrote:
> Here's a patch that implements a slight different approach. The idea
> is to allow a user to specify an 'override suite' which is used as an
> alternate/preferred suite for udebs.
I like the proposed patch as it is fairly non-invasive. However, I s
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > The Packages file isn't being overwritten; its being appended to.
>
> Ah, sorry for missing that point.
>
> The name mirror/udeb/override_suite is easily confused with mirror/udeb/suite,
> especially since both a
dann frazier wrote:
> The Packages file isn't being overwritten; its being appended to.
Ah, sorry for missing that point.
The name mirror/udeb/override_suite is easily confused with mirror/udeb/suite,
especially since both are basically used to override the udeb suite.
mirror/udeb/additional_suit
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:03:01PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
> > I want to use the udeb in the primary suite if there is no
> > corresponding udeb in the override_suite. The override_suite only
> > includes udebs that require customization. Does that answer your
> > question?
>
dann frazier wrote:
> I want to use the udeb in the primary suite if there is no
> corresponding udeb in the override_suite. The override_suite only
> includes udebs that require customization. Does that answer your
> question?
No, because I don't see how it works. Like I said, it downloads the
Re
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 05:16:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> How is setting mirror/udeb/override_suite any different than setting
> the existing mirror/udeb/suite?
>
> dann frazier wrote:
> > + for suite in "$codename" "$override_suite"; do
> > + fetch "dists/$suite/Release" "$Release" || exit
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How is setting mirror/udeb/override_suite any different than setting
> > the existing mirror/udeb/suite?
>
> I think Dann's idea is to get both and validate them.
Why? Apt already validates all Release files it uses. d-i can on
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How is setting mirror/udeb/override_suite any different than setting
> the existing mirror/udeb/suite?
I think Dann's idea is to get both and validate them.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [
How is setting mirror/udeb/override_suite any different than setting
the existing mirror/udeb/suite?
dann frazier wrote:
> + for suite in "$codename" "$override_suite"; do
> + fetch "dists/$suite/Release" "$Release" || exit $?
> + fetch "dists/$suite/$pkgfile" "$Package
dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's a patch that implements a slight different approach. The idea
> is to allow a user to specify an 'override suite' which is used as an
> alternate/preferred suite for udebs.
Nice idea. However I think you missed the template change, no?
--
Here's a patch that implements a slight different approach. The idea
is to allow a user to specify an 'override suite' which is used as an
alternate/preferred suite for udebs.
The reason I chose this approach is its consistency with other aspects
of our derivative distribution, namely its layered
11 matches
Mail list logo
