Bug#388759: aiccu license

2007-01-07 Thread Pim van Pelt
Hi folks, Thanks, Paul, for your insights. For your information, we have released AICCU today, using a BSD license as described. This should permanently take care of any legal issues you might have. On 1/7/07, Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The transition from non-free to main w

Bug#388759: aiccu license

2007-01-07 Thread Paul TBBle Hampson
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:02:51PM +0100, Pim van Pelt wrote: > We will change the aiccu license on our next release. Let us say, for > arguments sake, that we release our next version on Wednesday January > 10th (providing we can get everything done before that time), and the > license will be an

Bug#388759: aiccu license

2007-01-07 Thread Pim van Pelt
Paul, We will change the aiccu license on our next release. Let us say, for arguments sake, that we release our next version on Wednesday January 10th (providing we can get everything done before that time), and the license will be an unaltered BSD license. Will aiccu be included in the next stab

Bug#388759: aiccu license

2007-01-07 Thread Paul TBBle Hampson
Dear SixXS people, Just following up a long-outstanding Debian issue with the aiccu license. My reading of the documentation at [1] says that the intent of the license is to include a request for clauses 4 and 5 (the abnormal use clauses additional to the standard BSD license) ie. you can kindly